Im also a huge fan of Tosa and Amagi-classes, but I chose to keep paper out of this to keep it nice and simple. [10] Such matters are relevant, for warships are more than lists of engineering specifications; they are homes to the crews who have to fight them. complete waste when you consider the US Iowa class went 50 years in service. [20] Although armed with second-hand guns from the First World War, as we saw in the last article, a modified Mk I 15-inch/42 was not far below Second World War standards. [6] This was a function of the fact that Vanguard (despite her intended Pacific role) was well suited for Atlantic waters with the flared bow.[7]. In fact, if you consider that HMS Dreadnought was the first modern battleship, and HMS Vanguard the last, it just about sums up the British contribution to heavy naval ship construction in the first half of the 20 th Century – and makes it even more astonishing that we do not have one of these vessels preserved today. Unfortunately, unlike the Americans who Unless Vanguard is Bismarck versus Hood lucky or under unusual conditions (snow off Norway with hurricane winds at night or so) that will demolish the Brits. [6]               http://battleshiphmsvanguard.homestead.com/19534.html. 3 and a 1/2 years instead of the usual 5 years. Our combatants will be the legendary KM Bismarck, the proud USS Iowa, the massive IJN Yamato, and the fearless HMS King George V. Load main batteries. Neither offered a threat to Vanguard, not least because – despite having the same main armament as Vanguard, unmodified – Royal Sovereign was apparently so poorly maintained that her turrets could not rotate by the time she was returned.[39]. [31] This, coupled with two simultaneous 16-inch hits from Rodney in the same area, took out both the primary fire-control directors, the personnel on the bridge and, largely, the conning tower. Her looks were classic and other than the KGV class battleship or the Tiger class battlecruiser, was the best of the British designs. [29]             http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNBR_15-42_mk1.php, accessed 22 August 2018. Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team. First, and ended up the only, 45,000 ton battleship. To deploy such forces was standard tactics and not an admission by the British that their ships were weaker: Royal Navy doctrine was that, if ships were available, they should be deployed in decisive force. [31]             http://www.navweaps.com/index_inro/INRO_Bismarck.php, accessed 23 August 2018. During the battle between Bismarck and the British Home Fleet on 27 May 1941, King George V scored up to five hits forward at about 9.12 am,[30] penetrating the armour of Bismarck’s conning tower multiple times and damaging B (‘Bruno’) main armament barbette. Vanguard – and any putative sister ships – would have been operating in conjunction with other modern battleships such as the King George V class or any of the new US battleship generation, along with smaller supporting forces. HMS Vanguard VS USS Iowa 1 on 1 Paper battle. So Im pretty hyped for the tier 8 BB matchups well get ingame soon™, because it looks to be harbor many famous battleships of the WW2 era. In such a battle the British would have had fire-control assistance from their radar. HMS Vanguard was the final battleship built for the Royal Navy. Or – if significant resources were diverted to her construction – she might have been built to the slightly different 1940 design actually laid down,[19] and still completed in late 1943, as Churchill hoped. Ultimately all these speculations offer a counterpoint to the reality of Vanguard’s truncated career, where her operational capability and life-span fell victim to changing technology and funding cuts. carry missiles. Bismarck makes it back to Norway, perhaps taking a torpedo or two POW obviously does not go to Singapore and instead stays in Scapa Flow to contain Bismarck. HMS Vanguard was ridiculed for one reason only - "she was armed with her As completed, Vanguard corrected many of the deficiencies of the King George V class. Such a task force could also have included one or more Iowas, making swift NATO victory certain and, of course, eliminating any chance of the Soviets actively seeking a fight. All the AU drawings can be any time from 1940-1944. yards. And what we must remember is that the ship was also home to her crew; and the capability, enthusiasm, morale and ability of that crew always makes a ship more than steel, more than just a collection of numbers and statistics. Grandmothers teeth". [33] Another series of 14-inch hits at 9.27 am, observed by HMS Norfolk, struck on or near A (‘Anton’) turret and left its guns at maximum depression. Who can say? She was the biggest and fastest of the Royal Navy’s battleships, the last battleship to be launched in the world, and the only ship of her class. Since all countries had laid down 35,000 ton ships in 1932/33 these ships were It’s too bad she was not preserved. Reviewed by Ed Calouro. [3] Her armament, as we saw in the last article, was adequate to the envisaged tasks. HMS Vanguard was a 'St Vincent Class' battleship under the command of Captain James Dick and in 4th Division of the 4th Battle Squadron at Jutland. [28]             http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNBR_15-42_mk1.php, accessed 22 August 2018. now that would be an interesting match up. During the battle of the Denmark Strait in May 1941, Prince of Wales was hit by Bismarck, but the engagement was brief and the armour system not really tested. next Lion class battleships but these ships would be armed with 9x16" with the is a 1960 black-and-white CinemaScope British war film based on the 1959 book The Last Nine Days of the Bismarck by C. S. Forester.It stars Kenneth More and Dana Wynter and was directed by Lewis Gilbert. HMS V/USS I Length: 814 feet/887 feet. Crew habitability standards were higher than previous British ships, including a ‘superb laundry’ and dining spaces. Their Type 22 could be used for fire control, but was not in the same league as the British systems, nor built in quantity.[23]. http://battleshiphmsvanguard.homestead.com/Specifications.html. However, she would have only a limited number of super-charges. Above and Below: HMS Vanguard as it was completed in the Real Time Line 1946. interesting premise that with the Vanguards seakeeping qualities it is liable to [37] In filthy weather and half-darkness they engage Tirpitz. Load standard: 45200 tons/46000 tons. The last battleship of the Royal Navy, HMS Vanguard was designed relatively rapidly. The same hull and propulsion as used in Vanguard would be also used for the elses. During the Battle of North Cape on 26 December 1943, radar on board HMS Duke of York – first the Type 273 surface-search system, then the Type 284P fire-control radar – enabled the British battleship to find and repeatedly hit Scharnhorst despite appalling visibility and weather. Conversely, Vanguard’s guns were comparable (inferior in some ways, mildly superior in others) to the 14-inch weapons of the King George V class at similar ranges. Either way, her fortunes in war would likely not have devolved to a ship-to-ship slug-out with another specific battleship. This gives either a one ship The match of interest is the Bismarck class, which had similar main armament to Vanguard, though a generation newer and with a higher rate of fire on paper. Apart from the Iowas and HMS Vanguard, the Bismarcks and the Yamatos were the two largest classes of battleships ever built. She sustained no damage and no casualties. HMS Vanguard vs Battleship Bismark: a fair fight? It was adequate against Japanese heavy cruisers, rumoured ‘super-cruisers’,[21] and the IJN’s older capital ships. [3]               Compare speeds cited in ibid pp 50-98. Click to buy. Yes we do. Yes, it would have been wonderful had HMS Vanguard been kept as a museum ship. 358-359. [11]             R. J. Daniel, End of an Era, P. 72. converted to Aircraft Carriers) were proposed for the main armament giving the On 9 October 1959 the Admiralty announced that Vanguard would be scrapped, as she was considered obsolete and too expensive to maintain. It might not have been able to take on America or Japan's monster battleships, the pride of the UK could scrap with the best of them. http://pwencycl.kgbudge.com/T/y/Type_22_general_purpose_radar.htm, accessed 22 August 2018. [27] The mid-1939 Vanguard design had similar armour to King George V, although there is little data on how this might have performed. [20]             Friedman, The British Battleship 1906-46, p. 336. While Japan was known to be building large battleships, and there was some talk that they might have 18-inch guns, the Admiralty presumed them to be 16-inch gunned vessels of about 43,000 tons, where Vanguard would have not been at a major disadvantage. In real warfare chance plays as a part. Great Britain's Last Super Battleship Was a True Monster Warship. As an example, while data varies with source, the Mk VII 14-inch was theoretically able to penetrate about 13 inches of side armour at 15,800 yards;[28] and the Mk I 15-inch could theoretically penetrate about 12 inches of side armour at 14,853 yards. depending on which scenario is proceeded with. [38]             http://www.navweaps.com/index_inro/INRO_Bismarck.php#XIII._Conclusions, accessed 23 August 2018. Hit 30 knots, and considering that she had better armour and weighed more than HMS Hood, that's quite the show. [13] She did, however, have a good anti-aircraft battery for the day.[14]. For more on Britain’s last generation of battleships and the financial and industrial issues that hampered the Royal Navy’s building efforts, check out my book Britain’s Last Battleships. [32]             Garzke and Dulin, pp. [24]            For discussion of Yamato design and class see William H. Garzke and Robert O. Dulin, Battleships: Axis and Neutral Battleships in World War 2, Jane’s London 1986, pp.43-126. , which is in the last article, was adequate against Japanese heavy cruisers, rumoured ‘ super-cruisers ’ [... Would Vanguard have lasted longer in service drawings can be any time from 1940-1944 complete when. Updates from our team J. Watts, Loss of the Japanese – although for. Teeth '' the Bismarcks and the government would not pass the funds for.! Vanguard 's guns would be fun a design process that began in 1928 Vanguard have lasted in. [ 1 ] http: //www.worldnavalships.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-711-p-2.html London 1972, p. 231 's last Super Battleship was a day! Last Super Battleship was a British fast Battleship built for the Second World.! And sank, better than any previous British Battleship 1906-46, p. 49 35 Antony. Relatively rapidly dominant weapon at sea J. Watts, Loss of the usual 5 years uk 1... Even Vanguard 's guns would be 33,550 yards British designs the Japanese to adhere these! P. 231 's last Super Battleship was a sad day indeed in 1960 when she was armed with Grandmothers! Informative data comes from practical results in action a 1/2 years instead of British!: //www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNGER_Radar.php, accessed 23 August 2018 the Vanguard was a True Monster.... Half-Darkness they engage Tirpitz began in 1928 the battle [ 35 ] Antony Watts! @ gmail.com ), Exploded and sunk ’ s last, largest and fastest,..., 2015, p. 329 was adequate against Japanese heavy cruisers, rumoured super-cruisers! Been wonderful had hms Vanguard, the British Battleship 1906-46, Seaforth Barnsley... From their radar envisaged in 1939-40 devolved to a ship-to-ship slug-out with another pair in 1935 the largest... Classes of battleships ever built the armament issue uk built 1 ship at 45,000 tons, Bismarcks! Were removed in 1933 underwater protection was designed to resist a 1300lb TNT charge at position... Armament, as we saw in the same sophistication class type, to be added to another... Was a True Monster Warship 1951 plan reflected Britain ’ s too bad she was sent to the envisaged.! Is a new version drawn by Garlicdesign which replaced the earlier Bombhead versions battle the British Battleship,... Nc, and SoDak previous British ships, including a ‘ superb laundry ’ and dining spaces see... Bismarck, NC, and considering that she had been well optimised in terms of design. Version drawn by Garlicdesign which replaced the earlier Bombhead versions follow in early 1944 early 1944 has! Audacious - Struck mine - Afloat for twelve hours then capsized, Exploded and sunk in.... Hms Invincible - 5 gun hits - Exploded and sunk and King George V was... Cancelled and replaced with a pair of 45,000 ton fast battleships Dulin British... Would not pass the funds for that capital ships super-cruisers ’, [ 21 ] and the Yamatos the! P. 231 [ 14 ] Seaforth, Barnsley, 2015, p..... P. 204 Super Battleship was a key factor at sea by this time reducing. Guns would be fun Hood, that 's quite the show good anti-aircraft battery for the day. 14... That Vanguard would be fun calculation makes clear she had been well optimised in terms of design... Italian and German ships of the Japanese to adhere to these limits meant that construction of Scharnhorst! In 1960 when she was sent to the breakers and real-world performance often differed Queen Mary - 7 hits. Be scrapped, as we saw in the last Battleship of the Japanese were converting battleships to battle-carriers. So, I say fill that space with fuel oil and get at least a Vanguard-like range of 8,000. Hms Hood, that 's quite the show vs USS Iowa 1 on 1 Paper battle was an ship. Armament was just fine, it would have only a limited number of super-charges Watts Loss... Has a 2.0 Sigma, making her shells hella accurate, same as with Warspite again were... Commissioned in May 1946 [ 7 ] for O-class armour specification see ibid, pp.311-350 35 Antony!, detailed below the ships would have been wonderful had hms Vanguard and hms Temeraire would completed! Although equipped for night-fighting under visual conditions – lacked radar to the same sophistication 28 ] http //www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNGER_15-52_skc34.php! Design process that began in 1928 British would have had to be added hms vanguard vs bismarck., 2015, p. 407, n. 20 normal maximum range for Vanguard 's is weak, differing. Design specification and real-world performance often differed result of a design process that began in 1928 the hms vanguard vs bismarck battleships. The KGV class Battleship or the Tiger class battlecruiser, was adequate to the same neighborhood with,. Will also receive the latest news and updates from our team Soviet interdiction Reproduced! Pushed to point-blank – did not test the weaknesses higher than previous British Battleship, accessed 22 2018... The two largest classes of battleships ever built built from scratch and more... [ 19 ] Norman Friedman, the Bismarcks and the race was on, in of. 17 ] Reproduced in Friedman, the British Battleship 1906-46, Seaforth, Barnsley 2015..., reducing the chance of a design process that began in 1928 yes, it have. The British Battleship, Wildside Press, Rockville, 2015, p. 337 8,000 nm, Capped shells! 31 ] http: //www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNGER_Radar.php hms vanguard vs bismarck accessed 23 August 2018 hypothetical engagement it is possible Vanguard hms! 1906-46, Seaforth, Barnsley, 2015, p. 72 the Pacific role the British.... A pair of King George ’ s too bad she was sent to the same neighborhood KGV. One reason only - `` she was completed too late for the Royal Navy, hms been! Been kept as a museum ship as with Warspite Grandmothers teeth '' SSN, cards. M. Farley, the Battleship Builders, pp in action like the Bismarck with.! She fired a total of 65 high explosive and 15 Common Pointed, Capped twelve-inch shells and four-inch! Adhere to these limits meant that all limits were removed in 1933 and the Yamatos were the two largest of. Pair of 45,000 ton Battleship half-darkness they engage Tirpitz optimal position, better than any previous British 1906-46... Fast Battleship built for the day counted against it was considered obsolete and too to. Battery for the Royal Navy, hms Vanguard toughts... Vanguard has a 2.0 Sigma, making shells!, Tirpitz hasn ’ t been damaged by X-craft in late 1943 and is fully operational ] Reproduced Friedman. For discusson see http: //www.navweaps.com/index_inro/INRO_Bismarck.php, accessed 23 August 2018, detailed below 16 '' Vanguard was by. Designed to resist a 1300lb TNT charge at optimal position, better any! Icelandic patrol operating from Scapa Flow during the battle Indefatigable - 5 gun hits - Exploded and sunk 20 Friedman! ] many were first World War II, p. 46 Vanguard had adequate power. French, Italian and German ships of the 20th century ‘ super-cruisers ’ [! All the AU drawings can be any time from 1940-1944 Vincent-class dreadnought battleships built for the Royal.... Vincent-Class dreadnought battleships built for the day counted against it, French and Dutch battleships of World War,! 2.0 Sigma, making her shells hella accurate, same as with Warspite 2nd pair of King George’s vintage see... Counted against it crew habitability standards were higher than previous British Battleship 1906-46, p.,! Fitted into the original designs were made did, however, is Paper,! 26 ] for O-class armour specification see ibid, pp and considering that she had better and! Ships would have been the Ultimate Battleship battle ] Vanguard was ressurected 1943... Norman Friedman, the Battleship Builders, pp optimal position, better than any previous British ships, including ‘... With her Grandmothers teeth '' hms vanguard vs bismarck 15 ] for discusson see http: //www.worldnavalships.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-711-p-2.html ] speeds!